Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

The HfP chat thread – Saturday 30th October

Links on Head for Points may pay us an affiliate commission. A list of partners is here.

We are running this daily chat thread on Head for Points during the coronavirus outbreak.

Historically, the daily ‘Bits’ articles were the de facto repository for random comments and questions.  With the news flow being lighter, we are running fewer ‘Bits’ articles.

The comments under this article are where you should post questions about travel and, indeed, anything else on your mind.

Please only comment under the main articles on the site if your comment is directly related to the topic of the article.  This has long-term benefits as it keeps the commentary relevant for people who read those articles in the future.

Old chat threads are hidden from the HfP home page.  If you want to look for something in an old thread, click here.  This brings up all the articles in our ‘General’ category which includes the chat threads.

Comments (419)

This article is closed to new posts. Discussion continues in the HfP Forums.

  • Jonathan says:

    Thanks for the advice yesterday on Orlando hotels. Today, I am after recommendations for a hotel to stay at in Miami in October please with 2 little ones (5 and 2 to)? I have ihg points & spire status, Marriott points & gold and Hilton gold status. Also have lots of Amex MR points I could transfer elsewhere. TIA

    • Terri says:

      I have done the Miami/Orlando trip a number of times with young children. I have never found Miami that great for kids – its busy, lots of traffic, rooms on the small side, expensive to park, more dodgy looking people hanging about down by the beach.

      Last time in Miami stayed at the Marriott Doral which shares facilities with the Trump Doral over the road- there was a shuttle to take you over upon request or a 5 min walk. Hotel is on the airport flight path, so you need to like planes. Marriott has two bedroom apartments and free parking – it is not in the Miami hip area – that’s about 30 mins drive away.

      Unless you are desparate to be in Miami have you thought about Boca Raton, Lauderdale on the Sea or Fort Lauderdale which are all not far away amd much more family friendly.

    • ALEXANDER BARCLAY says:

      marriott doral is great we have booked there for january before travelling to orlando

    • Elguiri says:

      We have done the Homewood Suites by Hilton Miami-Airport/Blue Lagoon after arriving late in Miami, with a toddler it worked out fine.
      If you are happy to not do hotel there is an amazing Airbnb we have stayed at twice just north of Miami, near to oleta (inland) beach called Roxy’s endless summer cottage. Great base to travel up or down coast from.

  • Marie says:

    I have a 2 for 1 expiring in July 22 that I feel I won’t be able to use to it’s full potential so I was going to book a one way GLA and FTV it. Do we know when are BA going to withdraw this ability ? Is there any benefit in doing this today versus 3th July 2022 ? Many thanks

    • AJA says:

      We have no idea when BA might withdraw the FTV route. If you are remotely likely to be able to book a trip using the 2-4-1 in the normal way by next June then I would not exchange for a FTV. But if you really don’t think you’ll be able to use it then I’d change it sooner rather than later. Remember if you do exchange for a FTV you tie in the passengers and also will have to call to redeem it. This is a big disadvantage along with the fact that you tie up a minimum of 4500 Avios and £17.50 assuming you book the cheapest option.

  • Keely says:

    Is anyone else suffering Pre Flight Covid Test Syndrome ,…symptoms of which are anxiety and panic in case one of us tests positive on the day….
    Jamaica requires an in person LFT regardless of vaccination status . I’m sure it’s a real thing !

    • Yuff says:

      Yep so much so I cancelled Etihad flights in business for premium economy on BA.
      I am now waiting for 9 business class refunds from etihad 8 and BA 1

      • Keely says:

        This is a holiday where we are meeting other family out there (they’re flying from different airport) …likely to be the last time we are all together due to ages of kids etc . The closer it comes (we fly in three weeks) the more nervous I become !

    • Grimz says:

      Yep and I only require a LFT for USA

    • Andrew says:

      Yes. I’m hoping to travel out to the US on the 27th November, but my mate doesn’t want to book anything until we’re both tested clear 48 hours before flying.

      I can see the logic in it. Hopefully there’ll be a last minute bargain.

    • John Gallagher says:

      Assuming you are in the UK, order an NHS LFT and pick it up from a chemist. Put your mind at rest at least 🙂

      • Keely says:

        Yeah I have loads here as use to visit care home, will be doing that before we go!

      • TGLoyalty says:

        No need to order you can just walk in to local chemist and pick up

    • Can says:

      I always use one of the nhs lft to ease my mind

    • Lyn says:

      Definitely a real thing, and a good description of the syndrome, Keely! Especially when away from home. Double vaccination doesn’t seem to help in the least with the syndrome, but it definitely helps lessen the chances of a positive test.

    • Darko says:

      I get you. That’s why I have a box of free NHS tests with me so I can test myself before taking the Fit to fly or Day 2 return test. It calms the nerves knowing the result won’t be any different!

  • Pete1968 says:

    Looks like Bulb is either going bump in the next few days or else will be taken over for a song. I personally feel that whilst the energy price cap has a place, the 6 month interval between reviews is not fit for purpose. 3 months would be acceptable but every 2 months better suited to rapid market movements in the wholesale price of gas/ electricity.

    Ie currently all suppliers with customers on the energy price cap will be losing huge amounts of money on very unprofitable customer a/cs – and even more on the majority of customers on fixed rate deals arranged prior to about 4 months ago. Absolutely certain huge losses, as mandated by the government, it’s not surprising so many suppliers are throwing in the towel. I feel it’s a real shame to see popular suppliers like Bulb going under – I was on a great fixed deal with another highly rated supplier Avro but got switched to Octopus when they went bump, so at least I’m on the loss-making current energy price cap deal (minus about £10, I think 🙂 ). Avro were great – nice customer service and deals, what a shame they are no more.

    You could argue (I suppose) that the gas/ elec suppliers should have been hedging with forward contracts – most probably did to some extent – but the current turmoil in wholesale energy prices was unforeseen by 99% of people on the planet.

    • Nick says:

      They absolutely could and should have modelled what happens in the case of rising prices. They were idiots for not doing so.

      But as it happens, the big companies are rubbing their hands with glee at the moment, because they can think further ahead than 3 months and have enough cash/investment to ride it out. After the next review, the cap will rise massively. It’ll then be in place for 6 months, during which wholesale prices will likely fall rapidly. The small challenger firms have disappeared and can’t be resurrected at short notice. So for a lot of those 6 months the big firms are effectively expecting a licence to print money.

      • Will says:

        British Gas took over some of our family accounts a month or more ago from PFP. All sounded super efficient on the telephone and super friendly. Took my meter readings. However a month later nothing is properly set up and meter readings online are not showing and I can’t enter new ones. All front and no substance?

      • BuildBackBetter says:

        The big companies are happy not because of cash, but because they have long term contracts with suppliers and hedge their prices.

        Ofgem is just stupid and lazy. Have they not stress tested these scenarios? What do they do as a regulator? Now they are launching a public consultation on piece cap. Sure, the lay man would know more than an industry expert.

    • TGLoyalty says:

      Sorry but they have a price cap for 6m set in advance, a number of customers on fixed deals and a number of expected new acquisitions … it’s not hard to hedge price movements.

      Either they didn’t bother, did it badly or decided they were just going to roll the dice and lost.

      • Lady London says:

        +1

      • GHT says:

        This, a thousand times this. These businesses chose not to hedge prices to try and reduce costs given the fairly high cost of acquiring new customers. It was a one-way bet with serious moral hazard created by the system – if the market goes down, we win; if the market goes up and we’re out of pocket the regulator and other suppliers step in.

        Failure to hedge is absolutely bonkers.

        • J says:

          It’s not bonkers, it was just a high risk business model and they are rightly paying the price having called it wrong.

      • Will says:

        Exactly. Price cap is fine, 6 months is fine.
        OFGEM should have regulated that all customer fixed contracts must be hedged and variable rate customers must be hedged against the price cap.

        Of course now there’s going to be an issue if the price cap is below the wholesale rate for a significant time.

        • Will says:

          Also should have to ringfence overpayments,

          Looks like avro energy transferred millions in advance payments from customers to a company owned by the director for years prior to it folding.

          It has negative value as a company before covid even started

          • Pete1968 says:

            I read that about Avro as well – but they were very good to deal with as customers. They had some of the very best fixed deals in the market the past few years. Then – as an existing customer – when your fixed term came to an end, you had the opportunity to re-fix for another year at a rate that was better than anything else Avro themselves were offering to new customers. Invariably as good or nearly as good as anything else available from competitors – a great way to retain loyalty.

            A lot of businesses could learn from that, ie reward loyalty.

      • Anuj says:

        Exactly, surely the theoretical ‘social contract’ of privatising an industry (that shouldn’t be imo) is that they have the potential to make profits but at the risk of potential losses. If we subsidise them just as they make some losses we may as well just nationalise the lot. What value do these companies add apart from duplication of the same business functions times however many energy companies there are ?

        • TGLoyalty says:

          At the end of the day energy supply shouldn’t be private enterprise

          If ever there’s a case of private profits and public losses it’s utilities and public transport.

          • JDB says:

            When these businesses were run by government they did a terrible job if you recall! One of the reasons for privatisation was that the government did not want to pay the huge bill for renewal of the grid and local networks that needed to be done and has in fact been very successful; both are now much more resilient and flexible. The retail end is much more complex and in reality the last thing government wants to take on, for all the rhetoric and it is much easier for the government to get the private companies to add all the climate change levies on to bills but for the private companies to take the flak for the overall bill going up. It’s not intended to be a political point, but historically, all over the world, governments are by and large the most appalling managers of businesses, partly because like the government, companies they control run on electoral cycles/political interference which is usually a fiasco. Good companies are planning much further ahead than the electoral cycle and allocate capital more sensibly.

          • TGLoyalty says:

            @JDB government still subsides the cost of energy produced at new nuclear plants

            National rail is still responsible for maintaining, renewing and expanding railways.

            A car business (bought so it didn’t go bust) is very different to utilities and rail.

          • JDB says:

            Good points @TGL! They tried on rail, but Railtrack went bust…the level of debt in Network Rail at c. £55bn is pretty scary (which is why they wanted in the private sector but the private sector struggled) but as ever some sleight of hand has been arranged, whereby it doesn’t quite officially count as public debt.

            On nuclear, I fear it looks as though they are about to change the model so that we will get a new nuclear levy on all our bills up front rather than the government guaranteeing the future price at a high level (as at Hinkley Point) and the state effectively still guarantees the decommissioning.

          • JDB says:

            @TGL – for what it’s worth, I worked on the privatisation of EDF and it was, unlike most utility IPOs, a real struggle; investors really struggled with the risks of nuclear and there had to be a lot of arm twisting by the French govt to get it done as well as retail in France and Japan getting stuffed. The costs and risks are of a size/nature that only states can properly support.

        • Lady London says:

          Wow privatised profits users and taxpayers subsidise losses so payments can continue to shareholders for a moment there I thought you were talking about Heathrow.

          • JDB says:

            @Lady London the taxpayer used to bear the enormous losses generated by British Leyland/Rover! Was that a good thing? They made a complete horlicks of trying to run a car business that is a highly capital intensive industry and takes very long term planning.

        • JDB says:

          The big companies do make losses that are borne by the shareholders. Look at Centrica (British Gas) for example; that has not been a happy ride for shareholders. The small players now going bust are small fry that should never have been there. If you want to see the public and/or subsidised model in practice, look at Argentina. The government is being bankrupted by huge utility subsidies, or propping up the ones it owns so has to reduce the subsidies (as it has no money left) so there are riots and inflation goes through the roof as electricity is a big component. France is the lucky ones as the vast majority of electricity is nuclear so not affected by current prices, but water is largely privatised and incredibly expensive.

          • Pete1968 says:

            JDB – new round here so I don’t know your agenda, can I switch back to UK and gas/ elec suppliers?

            I’d have thought most right-thinking people would be happy to see suppliers making a small or medium profit over time, as they are in business to make a profit; take the business risks; save us all money by being more efficient than state-owned enterprises; give us choice.

            Here’s my model (Ofgem take note):
            – yes, energy price cap, but reviewed every 2 months
            – built in / straightforward calculation to work out the cap each review – ie fair standing charge (the cost of actually getting the power to your home), unit rate charge per kWh of gas and electricity that reflects the wholesale market, small margin for supplier to cover overhead etc and make a profit
            – 2 month reviews? easy these days to either do nothing (no change) or email changes to customers, just pressing a button
            – supplier wins or loses in the short term according to short term changes in wholesale pricing but doesn’t need to look 6-12 months ahead/ can & should still hedge with forward contracts to avoid volatility
            – but suppliers would be much less unlikely to go bust because wholesale prices turned against them significantly overnight
            – preserves the idea of challenger cos doing OK & keeping the big 6-8 on their toes/ more competition

          • JDB says:

            @Pete1968 what you say sounds eminently sensible! The price cap was well intentioned but doesn’t work so well in practice. The concept of adding competition to the big 5/6 was good except that you need to be big enough to weather the volatility in markets which these little players couldn’t. I suspect they couldn’t or didn’t hedge enough because hedging costs money. P.S. I don’t have an agenda; I fully understand why many people think utilities should be public but the real world experience of nationalised companies is generally not good and they are starved of capital because there are more politically expedient uses for the cash.

          • Pete1968 says:

            Bulb is an energy company that should never have been forced to go bust or be taken over for a song. Popular and right for so many reasons:
            – The best kind of energy – 100% of Bulb’s electricity is renewable
            – Trusting your energy supplier – great service is first, last and everything (yes, great service)
            – Fair prices that stay fair (and yes, prices were/ are always fair)
            – No bull about switching – Bulb paid any fees for you to switch away from a competitor to them – plus levies no charges if you want to switch away from Bulb
            – Doing the right thing – for every new member that switches to Bulb, we donate £2 to Bulb Foundation which makes grants to charities and social enterprises tackling the climate crisis head on.

            Thanks, Ofgem for messing up.

    • Paul Pogba says:

      You can buy nat gas futures to (at least) Sep 2023 so you could argue the cap could be bi-annual but the cost of the contracts would need to be reflected in the cap.

  • Chris says:

    Random question; i am coming back form a work trip and going on vacation next week. I need a hair cut … does anyone know if the barbers in T5 arrivals still open?

  • Jim says:

    Anyway of getting a US number from the UK?

  • Will says:

    Has anyone received the 750 Clubcard points from the Hotels.com promotion a few MO the ago. I think mine are due now but haven’t seen them. Prob a call to Tesco bank. Or a call to Hotels.com. Or a call to Clubcard. Either way could be a long haul.

  • Adam says:

    I am not a creation IHG card holder but out of curiosity; has anyone posted their account closure, fee and missing points and voucher, issues to times money trouble shooter (troubleshooter@thetimes.co.uk) to investigate?

    • BuildBackBetter says:

      And also provide the details of the MS they’ve done?

      • J says:

        I doubt those who did MS are too fussed about losing a free night voucher/fee refund. But clearly many who never touched MS are being screwed over by Creation. Seems a decent suggestion from Adam.

        • Char Char says:

          Both should be entitled to what they have paid for from the card anyway, its Creation who failed to regulate their cards use.

          • J says:

            Sure, but I’m not sure there would be much media sympathy if Creation can reply that the person cited has churned millions.

          • Char Char says:

            The MS are likely not the majority of creation customers, so it is pointless people keep referring to the few or 1 person who ‘churned millions’

          • J says:

            As I said in my first post here, it was a sensible suggestion – but best communicated by someone who is in the unfairly treated majority. Surely you can see that it matters who puts in the individual complaint as to how the response is handled?

      • Tw33ty says:

        Not all have ms’d who are getting their accounts closed.
        It’s just that a vocal few who did are on here, so everyone gets tarred by the same brush.
        I personally know off two people I work with who are getting their accounts closed, and both don’t use hfp and have never heard of curve.
        One puts about 40-50k through his ihg black with zero ms and all genuine spend, and the other has the white card they only use for a lot of ihg hotel stays and nothing else.
        Both these account will be making creation a loss due to their spend patterns, I believe this is why they are being closed.
        The assumption that everything is down to card holders misuse is both wrong and will only flame tensions on here.

        • J says:

          I suspect you’re right. Has there actually been anything communicated to anyone (apart from by clearly confused customer support workers) that a) Curve was a factor b) Pro rata refunds won’t happen c) Free night’s won’t credit d) Points won’t eventually transfer.

          • Char Char says:

            The letters don’t mention Curve however all the other points have been confirmed in responses to queries in emails.

          • J says:

            But equally many on here have mentioned emails saying the opposite. (Customer service is clearly a mess there.) Eg. Cardholder choice of refund or voucher; Points transfer is a temporary glitch; Creation closing all accounts.

          • Tw33ty says:

            With regards to point d, I have a letter from creation, a reply to my complaint, and in it, it states I can still earn points up to the 3rd off December. So that throws even more confusion into the mix.

          • Char Char says:

            @J
            What sort of communication are you referring to if replies from their customer services, letters and emails don’t count?

          • J says:

            @Char Char: Anything that has been escalated beyond front line support and is consistent across customers. As far as I can tell the letter most of us received is the strongest, most consistent communication to date. Most of the rest seems to be muddled, and often from front line support who appear just as clueless to Creation’s intentions as anyone else.

        • JDB says:

          Did the people you mention maybe use the card for business expenses that aren’t permitted under the T&Cs? The £40-50k sounds quite a lot for personal spending on a MasterCard.

          Curve appears to be just a common theme, not a reason for closure in itself.

          • Tw33ty says:

            Yeah the 40-50k was a director renovating his second home( maybe even third)
            The white ihg via hotel spend was business hotel spend in Uk and Europe, but his ihg hotel account wasn’t linked to a corporate account and no corporate codes etc used.
            I’ve never checked terms for actual business spend rules, but if you’ve ever stayed at a hotel and join the morning corporate check out I’d the big chains, most are using hotel branded cards or avois earning cards.

        • Alan says:

          My wife’s white card is being closed. She very rarely used it (she had a companion card on my black account). She did use it with her Curve card but only for actual purchases no MS. The only reason I can see for them closing her card is that she used it with Curve.
          For the record, my black card is also being closed but my record is less pure (although always within the Ts&Cs of the card). There may have been a small amount of MS mixed in with genuine use.

      • Char Char says:

        “And also provide the details of the MS they’ve done?”
        Sounds like someone missed out!

        • Will says:

          I have not had any letter saying card account to be closed. Points credited this month (around 25th) and I have used with curve but never did excessive MS. I have paid off other credit cards in the past (think with virgin or Hilton) but not since the added fee became payable. The note above says all creations closing. Assume that is not true, or is it??? Should get spire this month so just holding on for the November credit!!

          • J says:

            Someone in the chat yesterday said they had been told they were closing all accounts. But the messaging all seems very mixed atm, so I doubt anyone really knows what’s going on – especially Creation Customer Support.

      • Adam says:

        It doesn’t matter if MS was done or not. If everything was done by the books and according to T&Cs etc you are within your rights to what was agreed as per T&Cs.
        MS was a loophole which they should have caught and blocked longtime ago. Similar to how people take benefits of tax loopholes…

        • J says:

          You’re right on the legal side, but not in terms of whether or not it is the smart call to seek media support.

          • Adam says:

            What’s there to lose in any case?
            If they cite MS then at least they will have to do it, publicly.
            Unless there is a fear media attention will draw other companies to do a mass purge?
            In that case bendy will disappear…

          • Char Char says:

            It’s not helpful when people cite the MS abusers at every point taking action against creation, they are clearly a small amount of the total creation customers affected.

          • J says:

            @Adam: What is there to lose by having someone who didn’t do MS place the complaint with The Times? All I’m saying is that, to me, it makes more sense to have someone with ‘a clean record’ make a complaint, than someone who Creation could paint in a bad light.

      • QFFlyer says:

        Why not, it doesn’t violate any T&Cs. All these people on their high horse about MS smh.

    • Benilyn says:

      This Creation debacle is nearly bad as the 500 Avios bonus for linking your Nectar & BAEC account, it’s generating nearly same amount of posts.

      • Char Char says:

        How so? When people are literally going to be in some cases £100’s out of pocket, if thats not applicable to you then move don’t respond to the comments.

This article is closed to new posts. Discussion continues in the HfP Forums.